My reactions to their reactions

"The abuse of power and the cloak of secrecy from the White House continues. ... It's a devious maneuver that evades the constitutional requirement of Senate consent and only further darkens the cloud over Mr. Bolton's credibility at the U.N." — Sen. Edward M. Kennedy

"The president has the right to make this recess appointment, but it's the wrong decision. It only diminishes John Bolton's validity and leverage to secure America's goals at the U.N. John Bolton has been rejected twice by the Senate to serve as our Ambassador to the United Nations. This is not the way to fill our most important diplomatic jobs." — Sen. John Kerry

"It's sad that even while the president preaches democracy around the world, he bends the rules and circumvents the will of Congress in appointing our representative to the United Nations." — Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg

Abuse of power? Why was it alright for Clinton to do the very same thing Mr. Kennedy? Hey John-boy You lost! Shut the hell up, you are irrelevant! And again, let me reiterate my first point for Frank who seems to be toeing the party line very closely... If it was ok for Clinton to do it, why is it wrong for Bush? Oh wait, let me guess. It's wrong because Bush isn't a condescending metrosexual ass like the second buffoon above!

"John Bolton is the wrong person for the job and the decision to appoint him today will not serve American foreign policy well at all. ... His history of inflammatory statements about the U.N. will also make it difficult for him to effectively advance U.S. security interests in New York and bring about necessary reforms to that institution." — Sen. Barack Obama

His remarks aren't inflammatory, they are true! Some times you have to drop the PC facade and call a spade a spade! How can you fix what's broke if you refuse to utter the real problem diagnosis?

"John Bolton has placed his faith in a unilateral, go-it-alone foreign policy that has stretched our military thin, and I believe his inability to be an effective and constructive ambassador could produce dire consequences for American foreign policy." - Sen. Dianne Feinstein

You know Diane, with your antimilitary voting record, you should be glad to see the thing you hate, the military, in distress.

"He is exactly the wrong person to send to the United Nations at a time when we are trying to rebuild our credibility around the world. ... I now fear that we have lost an important opportunity to help re-establish the United States' global role as a moral and responsible leader." — Sen. Jay Rockefeller

Hey Jay! Our credibility around the world is better now than it has been in quite some time. While your democrap president's were in place, they'd hem and haw and pussy foot around actually saying "Do it or we're going to kick your fucking ass!" Sometimes that's the only language a bully will understand. I know you think we should be negotiating with the terrorists and maybe they'll leave us alone, but when you were in school getting your ass kicked by the bullies how often did that work? Oops, sorry, I know you don't like being reminded of your painful childhood. Children can be so cruel especially when you are as goofy as all of you fuckers are!

Here's a challenge for all of you liberal UN lovers out there. Can you tell me what the UN has done for the USA lately that makes them worth the amount of money us taxpayers pour into it?

Here is a little article for you liberal cretins to read and absorb!

Labels: ,

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com