Where are you now?

Recent events have me utterly puzzled.  In the last few weeks the following has occurred... 

In Egypt the secular military has unseated the muslim brotherhood backed president because he asserted himself as a tyrant and condoned attacks against Coptic Christians.  The military has cracked down on the muslim brotherhood and has been working on putting down their violent protests in the streets.  Our president has come out on the side of the muslim brotherhood - a group FIRMLY connected to al Qaeda.  They are a group who seeks to install sharia as the governing system in Egypt.  They are also the group that spawned Ayman al Zawahiri, the current global leader of al Qaeda.

In Syria, it is claimed that a chemical weapons attack has occurred.  There has been strong evidence that one three separate instances in the past, these attacks have been staged by the al Qaeda forces opposing the Assad regime.  Again, Obama has come out on the side of al Qaeda.

John Kerry stood in front of a camera citing this dubious evidence of WMD use as the justification to attack a foreign country.  Military planners are preparing plans to carry out the president's threat to attack and we've been told to expect actions "sooner rather than later".

When George W. Bush sent his secretaries out to justify an attack on a foreign country using the specter of WMD's, liberals lined up to scream foul, yet they are now absolutely silent now.  Where are they now?  Have they lost their voice?  Clearly their convictions are based solely upon the party affiliation held by the occupant of the white house.

I told them then and I'll reiterate it now - the time to speak is BEFORE American blood is spilled because once it is, we must support our sons and daughters deployed into harm's way.

I'm speaking now.  So should you.

Where are you?  If your outrage was indeed truthful then the fact that Obama is a democrat should not alter your convictions. 

George W. Bush sought and received Congressional sanction for his actions in Iraq.  That was not enough for you.  Obama seeks no such sanction, as he has done many times before, he has decided to rule by fiat.  Yet that yields no ire from you?

The formula is so simple,  The situation is so clear and easy to adjudicate.  In Syria a tyrant who hates America and wants to kill Americans (in fact he already has killed quite a few) is killing people who hate America and want to kill Americans (and in fact they too have already killed quite a few).  Are you gullible enough to believe that if we help one side or the other that they will hate us less?  Their hatred is based solely on the fact that we are not muslims and until that changes (and we have to be the right "flavor" of muslims BTW) we will remain hated.  No all it will do is further inflame the other side against us.

We are handing these people weapons.  Congressional testimony has shown that the attack in Benghazi in fact was fueled by the local al Qaeda group's (Al Qaeda in the islamic Maghreb) desire to acquire hundreds of man-portable surface to air missiles that the Obama administration had collected from Qaddafi's left-over stockpiles and intended to funnel to the al Qaeda elements fighting in Syria.  It appears al Qaeda didn't like the price Obama was asking and simply took the weapons.  That's the secret he was hiding during the election by the way, the fact that he'd lost HUNDREDS of missiles that can take an airliner out of the air far easier than they can engage a combat aircraft that has counter measures against such weapons.

How does that work?  Obama wants al Qaeda to have weapons, MILITARY weapons.  He sends weapons to murderous Mexican drug gangs - MILITARY weapons but he doesn't want law abiding American citizens to have weapons that just LOOK LIKE military weapons?  On this point the anti-weapon left is also silent.

What do you think will happen to these weapons once al Qaeda is done using them against Assad?  Do you think perhaps they will glibly hand them back to Obama?

I am left to ask  "Where are they now?"  Where are the vocal anti-war protesters? Where's hideous old Cindy Sheehan and Code Pink?  Obviously they're just against Republican wars,  Where are YOU?  Where is your moral outrage at the very same transgressions that inflamed it just a few years ago?  Shame on you and shame on your feigned outrage.

My friends let me reiterate the situation.  There are people who hate us and want to kill us and have killed us killing EACH OTHER.  The only LOGICAL response is to do nothing but pray for a VERY high body count!  STAY OUT OF IT!  It is not worth a single drop of precious American blood or a single slim dime of treasure to prevent it.  In fact that would be counter productive.

Obama, why do you back militant Islamists and al Qaeda endangering your own people?

News Round Up 1/26/2012

Article: Arizona Gov. Brewer gets book critique from Obama

What a pathetic, thin-skinned, petulant child! This man is supposed to be our president and can't comport himself with even the requisite level of decorum when someone disagrees with him. Perhaps that might be why Washington can't compromise! Even the much loathed George W. Bush was capable of graciousness when confronted with the most venomous criticisms ever leveled at a president.

---

Article: Ahmadinejad says Iran ready for nuclear talks

"Ahmadinejad says Iran ready for nuclear talks" I believe that... MILLIONS wouldn't but I do. This is just another stall tactic. Of course Obama will be dumb enough to buy into it, "See I knew my sanction approach would works... Say what is that mushroom shaped cloud doing over Saudi Arabia's oil fields?"

---

Article: Taxpayers still owed $132.9B from bailout: report

That would be the 132.9 billion dollar donation we taxpayers were "generous" enough to give the unions. Plan on seeing large chunks of it spent to reelect Obama.

---

Article: Cops: Man, 65, kills teen who knocks him off bicycle

Score another point for the necessity for concealed carry and the innate human right to self-defense.

---

Article: Gingrich vows to establish a colony on the moon

It would be refreshing to have a real space program with real attainable goals again. It might be a good idea to construct an expeditionary vessel in orbit that could be provisioned for long range exploratory trips to say Mars or the asteroids and the re-provisioned, re-tooled and reused for the next trip. There are a set of similar requirements that would mean the we could realize a real amount of savings with this approach... This would use the lessons we learned about the benefits of re-use from the space shuttle program.

---

Article: Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

Let me get this straight, a leftist from a left leaning school has designed a study to prove that we conservatives are stupid and prejudiced. Now there's a big surprise... It would have been a greater surprise if he'd arrived at a different outcome.

---

Article: Video: Divers find large, unexplained object at bottom of Baltic Sea

Interesting... Anyone care to speculate what it might be?

---

Article: U.S. to Iraq: don't "blow this opportunity"

Whether you agree with the decision to go to Iraq or not, it would be sad to see all the shed blood and spent treasure be for naught just because we were in a breakneck hurry to get out. But then again we've wasted so much lately why would I be daft enough to believe this would be any different?

---

Article: Panetta: US ground forces would be cut by 100,000

This is utterly, positively MORONIC!!! Third world nation status... Here we come! The liberals have redistributed all of our wealth around the globe and now Obama's going to squander all of our military supremacy... Why do I see more "leading from behind" in his future. I served in the military right after Jimmy Carter decimated it. We didn't even have parts to fix our vehicles. Half of them were red lined and unable to be moved. Compared to this travesty, that hardship was a walk in the park.

---

Article: Report: 36 Obama staffers delinquent on federal taxes

Hey Barack, maybe before you work on getting the rich to pay "their fair share" you ought to work on getting your people to do so first! Seriously, people in glass houses shouldn't toss rocks!

---

Article: Vets oppose speech by general who demonized Islamists

I frequently get crucified when I state the truth but here goes. The military is by and large conservative. In every annual Stars and Stripes poll, soldiers self-identify to at least 70%, as being conservative. Are there liberal veterans? Of course, but they are the vastest minority (and are just the ones that haven't yet learned which side their bread is buttered on). Now, to this particular group, VoteVets... The majority of their membership does not claim to be veterans. There has been a large number of their members who do claim to be veterans identified as perpetrators of what we veterans call "stolen valor"; low-life posers who claim to be veterans or actual veterans who inflate the nature of their service. This organization is a George Soros financed liberal venture just like move-on.org or ACORN. The fact that such a group would not wish to be told about the true nature of our enemies... does not surprise me in the least.

---

Article: Bill Would Ban Aborted Fetuses in Food

Say what?!?

Happy Dirt Nap Day!!!

Navy SEALs took out Osama bin Laden Yesterday. Thank You! I can not say that often enough! We all know that Obama will try to take credit for this victory, but this victory is come in spite of and not because of his anemic leadership. Early released details indicate that actionable intelligence was initially gleaned from Kalid Shiek Mohammed's interview. That information was later corroborated during the interview of Abu Farraj al Libbi. This intelligence was then worked by our operatives in the CIA on the ground in Pakistan. Obama of course would have NEVER collected this infromation from these two men and the democrats have also felt free to hold our CIA operatives up to prosecution for doing the unseemly things that at times need to be done to protect us.

It was also reported that bin Laden's body was disposed of at sea to prevent any shrine from being built for him. I hope they stuffed every orifice with bacon before they tossed his worthless carcass overboard!

Now ol' Zawahiri and the traitor Gadahn better be some ducking and runnin' mo' fo's because pretty soon you're going to look like your boss!

==== UPDATE ====

As the news has slowly spooled out regarding bin Laden's death there are some interesting tidbits to share. True to form the anointed one is storming about claiming this as his great victory and vindication for his administration. How convenient that is, considering that he's been taking one hell of a shellacking in the opinion polls lately. Well, there are a few details that he is of course NOT heralding from the roof tops.

Remember how terrible the democrats find all those "secret CIA prisons abroad"? The intelligence that broke bin Laden's location was collected there.

Remember how terrible they find water boarding? The intelligence was extracted using that technique. Beyond that, the information that corroborated it was also collected by these means.

Remember what a terrible intrusion they thought it was to intercept telephone calls placed to terrorists? Well guess what... The courier who exposed bin Laden's location revealed himself during one of those intercepted phone calls.

All of these intelligence collection activities happened BEFORE Obama took office.

None of these things would have been presumably done under the Obama administration. He can honestly only take credit for giving the order to mount the operation and nothing more. A publicity coup fell into his lap in his greatest time of need and he seized it with both hands. That is his only courageous act, an act of selfish self promotion.

To date he's not credited the president who actually presided over the collection of the information. He's not admitted that he may have been wrong about the utility of the practices that brought the leads to light. That would require true character and true courage and we all know he does not possess even the slightest modicum of those traits.

Bin Laden's death is OF COURSE a great boon for the United States. It was a great feat for our intelligence operators fighting in the trenches to protect us. It bear stark testament to the bravery of our troops and it pin points, like a spotlight what an opportunistic leach of a glory hog our current president is. Don't give him and his parasitic followers the satisfaction.

The standard troop of muslim apologists have marched forward to claim that killing bin Laden was improper and that disposing of his worthless carcass at sea was an insult and not in keeping with expected muslim burial practices. They threatened that these facts will inspire more of their insane fellow muslims to participate in the jihad... Well guess what, no matter what we do, you freaks find it a reason to hate and kill us... BUT we will find a way to get you, even in spite of the protection of nations like Pakistan and in spite of any inept leadership that happens to sit in our oval office. We will be avenged and you will suffer bin Laden's fate.

The Egyptian Crisis - A Question of Morals

There's been a lot of coverage on the news lately about the uprisings throughout the Middle East, most especially in Egypt . Many of the commentators have been making doomsday prognostications of a repeat of the Iranian revolution, claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood may rise to power in the turmoil. I've also heard many making excuses for America 's support of Mubarik saying things like, "better to support a dictator than to have chaos".

Let me make myself absolutely clear. America has a clearly stated set of over-arching collective morals. Our forefathers proclaimed those morals loudly and boldly to the whole world saying:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

This statement put for the first time to pen something that every person has always known instinctually in their inner core. This incontrovertible truth must be our answer in every such foreign policy case. To see success, we must be true to our core beliefs and live that bold and unprecedented truth to its fullest.

All too often we've side-stepped these principles and paid the grim price. We've supported one despot after another out of expedience. We've allowed an enemy of our enemy to be our friend. We must never do that again. A deal with a devil inevitably and invariably ends up costing you your soul. We have paid that dire price far too frequently. Those who wish to harm this country from within have often used this sort of expedient relationship to point out how base and evil America is. We are indeed imperfect and must learn finally and at long last from the error or our ways.

America must always stand on the side of liberty. Expedient deals with dictators may get you what you want in the short term. It may prevent a war now that would make your political waters perilous, but to avoid the short-sighted mistakes of the past our stance should always be that self determination is the inalienable right of all men.

Sure, the people may choose poor leaders (Heck even we have elected our current disastrous president). Some time ago, a frequent critic of mine cynically pointed out the results of the election in the Gaza strip where Hamas came to power as an example of how my belief was flawed. These things do happen, but we must support the will of the people and fight to preserve their right to choose. We must do this because while the fervor of the moment may lead the masses to a poor choice, inevitably free men will choose peace. So if they elect a dictator, we must oppose the ability of that elected dictator to prevent being removed when the people change their minds. Our only response to such an unpropitious choice in leadership is to insist on preserving their freedom to choose more appropriate leadership once they have tired of the predations of the thugs they've chosen and to isolate those governments we disagree with to hasten the people's reawakening.

Modern progressive liberals see this as their core conundrum. They despise the fact that men are fallible and believe that an all-powerful government is the only way to dispense with the fallibility of man and thus protect us from ourselves. They strive to create perfection with more regulation and ever more complicated and convoluted laws intended to address every odd edge case. But that government too is a fallible construct of fallible men. Chasing perfection is a fool's errand. Instead I choose to believe that the majority of men long for peace, seek justice and are innately good and with that in mind, I cast my wholehearted support behind the notion that the fallibilities of man will come and go and that they are always best countered by allowing free men to learn from the errors of their ways.

I've heard many from the left say that we can not "impose" freedom on a place. In response to that I am going to say something that I do not often say. That stance is utterly and absolutely un-American. It flies in the face of that preeminent foundational statement of our collective morals made so many years ago. The words expressed are not that "All white men are created equal" or "All men in this country" or even "All men in this hemisphere". It states that unequivocally ALL men, wherever they may happen to exist, are created to be equals and that they have at the center of their being a right to liberty and self determination. If you seek peace, then we must strive to introduce freedom in every land and have a responsibility to impose the will of the people over every despot that constrains freedom. For only when all men are truly free will we as a species experience lasting and durable peace.

Gadahn Nabbed

The Pakistani government has announced the capture of Adam Gadahn this morning. You do not know how long I have awaited the day that this traitorous piece of dung is pulled out of circulation. To al Quaeda he is known as Azzam al Amriki (Azzam the American). To me he is know as a walking corpse. I just hope that Obama doesn't pardon him. With my luck he will. I just hope he gets a nice horny Biker as a cell mate. Oh well at least he's done helping our enemies.

The Afghan Plan

So last night Obama rolled out his new plan for Afghanistan. Paraphrased it was, "We're going to send a bunch more of you military types over there to die before we surrender." Obama was also very careful to not give his handpicked General the number of troops he asked for. I mean god forbid that it look like he was bowing to the military. He saves that for foreign royalty. Well royalty and the far left of his party that is.

I would really like to know what the hell happened to the Roosevelt Democrats. I fear they are an extinct species. Here I thought the libs were all over preserving endangered species... Guess you all dropped the ball on that one huh?

The Peaceful Religion Strikes Again

The news is still evolving, but it appears that an Army Major, one Nidal Malik Hassan murdered 11 and wounded 31 others at Fort Hood. Early reports indicate that Hassan had advocated Muslims rising up to kill American soldiers. This man was a psychiatrist who had been assigned to care for soldiers returning from combat who suffered from PTSD or addictions. Now I have to ask, what genius allowed that?

Questions still remain. It was reported that the murderer was armed with two 9mm handguns. Anyone who knows firearms knows that causing death or injury to 42 persons with two 9mm handguns would take quite a bit of effort. It is not something that an Army doctor is normally trained to do. Army doctors are not combat troops, They are not trained to engage in combat operations. How were so many injured or killed with such meager arms?

Further, it has been reported that Hassan had come to the attention of army officials 6 months ago for internet blog postings that equated muslim suicide bombers with soldiers who throw themselves on hand grenades to save their comrades.

Hassan was shot dead by a security contractor, ending his murder spree. The officer was also mortally wounded in the exchange.

I hope this pig died a long slow painful death.

- - - U P D A T E - - -

It appears that Hassan is not dead! He was wounded and survived. Would someone in that hospital that holds him please feed him some bacon and salve his wounds in rancid pig fat! Further news is that a female MP was the one who took him down.

- - - U P D A T E - I I - - -

The heroic first responder that ended this fanatic's murder spree, Kimberly Munley is not deceased. She too survived the ordeal. All I can say is I wish she had aimed better!

Quick Round Up

There are several things quick things I'd like to cover quickly:

1.) NASA is launching a mission to the moon. They intend to crash an impactor into the south polar region of the moon some time in October. The impact should be large enough that amateurs should be able to witness the event live in a moderate power telescope. Here is the mission home page.

To this I say, "Cool!"

2.) It seems that Obama is replacing hundreds of dollars per month in food stamps for some laid off workers' families with a single $25 check. Here is an article about it.

To this I say, "How ironic."

3.) Some people have been giving me crap for calling Carlos Bledsoe's (aka. Abdulhakim Muhammad) attack on the recruiting station in Arkansas a terrorist attack. Well it seems I'm not the only one raising this concern. According to this article, there are quite a few folks thinking that same thing.

To this I say, "I told you so!"

Beyond that let me do a little prognostication. Be prepared for a wave of similar attacks. Our muslim foes want to convert this country to an islamic nation and they are making in-roads in that effort. Already many are leaving prison inducted into the religion and radicalized as well. Al Quaeda has been attempting to specifically recruit terrorists that do not fit the young muslim male mold. They are looking for people that do not automatically raise suspicion.

4.) Obama has been calling for "fiscal restraint" and abiding by "pay go" rules. This is simply amazing. After signing a huge $800 billion laundry list of unfunded liberal pork under the guise of providing economic stimulus, he suddenly wants budget discipline?

To this I can say nothing because I am laughing too hard to speak!

Oh and that "stimulus" package... Where's the stimulative effect?

NYT Strikes Again

I can't figure out the liberal thought. The New York Times recently caught wind of secret efforts on the part of our military to teach the Pakistani military in tactics used to thwart terrorists. Clearly having the US military operating in any fashion on Pakistani territory is something that a large segment of the Pakistani public (specifically that part that thinks Sharia Law and honor killing is a spiffy idea) would be against. The New York Times however does not care that exposing this program might hinder the war on terror or that it might endanger those troops participating in this effort. They of course post this info out there for all to see (click the title of this post to see the article). I'm just waiting to see them post the dates and times of impending attacks on terrorist positions like bus schedules. Perhaps they should ditch their current lifestyles section and start posting halal recipes and hijab-clad women should fill their fashion section. Idiots one and all.

An Atmosphere of Fear

Prior to the election of the sainted Barack, any time the specter of terrorism arose in political discourse our liberal foes would lower their crooked, boney fingers accusingly and shriek the words "fear monger!" Indeed we had been attacked. In fact, more people died in the attack on 9/11 than died during the attack that launched this nation into World War II. Of course the libs denied in droves that it was terrorists that perpetrated that attack. It was of course our own government that killed all of those people they posited.

This perception that we were "using fear" was bolstered by the fact that the much hated president Bush had been so very effective at preventing further attacks. Our men and women in uniform had taken the fight to the terrorists' home turf and kept them busy there. Our national security agencies had managed to break up every attempt to cause us further harm. The libs were lulled into a false sense of security.

Well now that atmosphere of fear mongering has of course subsided. The holy Hussein has ascended his throne and now everything is goodness and light, right?

Well no. Obama is trying to shove trillion dollar spending packages down our throat so fast that no one can look under the covers to see what a bitter pill that package truly is! He tries to sell it as an economic stimulus package. Of course no one is stupid enough to believe that a trillion dollars worth of condoms, dog parks, butterfly resorts, gifts for perpetrators of voter fraud and STD research is going to stimulate a damned thing (except for the egos of the liberal legislators that take their seats in the Kremlin of the new USSA). Everyone with a clear mind sees that this "stimulus" package is nothing more than a tool to cram pork and liberal societal engineering experiments down our throats.

What is Obama using as a shoe horn to cram this thing down our throats? Why nothing but good old fashioned fear mongering of course! If you don't pass the "stimulus" package then the economy is going to crater and "500 million Americans" a month are going to lose their jobs (never mind the fact that there are only about 300 million Americans Ms. Pelosi). The economic Aramagedon will of course be horrendous if Barry doesn't get his raft of needless spending.

What is the specter he is trying to avert? Why a recession of course. What is a recession really? In my mind a recession is nothing more than the American consumer getting a piss poor attitude and deciding to hold on to their cash. It really isn't anything more than that. Some glitch happens in the markets and the consumers get spooked and stop spending. There is no systemic flaw that causes a recession there isn't anything that can be done to stop it from happening beyond changing the mind set of the consumer. How does tossing all of this needless fear mongering about positively effect the attitude of the consumer? Simply said, it doesn't. In fact it makes it worse.

So when we raised the specter of a real determined enemy that wants to do us true harm we were worthless fear mongers but when Barry-boy tries to cram a trillion dollars worth of spending and social engineering down our throats using fear of nothing more than a bad attitude, that's perfectly OK! Mass-murderers are not to be feared, but a consumer with a piss-poor attitude that is dire! Right!

The American voter isn't that stupid. Support for the "stimulus" bill initially started out being very high. Many pollsters placed the support level at 78-80%. But as soon as the details of what this sham of a deal contained were released the support rocketted into the cellar. Now the pollsters place the support for this monstrosity down around 30-35%. Of course it doesn't matter what the hell the American people want. Washington is deaf to our pleas! Washigton has been deaf to our pleas for decades and the election of Barry-boy will not do a damned thing but deepen that trend.

Speaking of those terrorists that want to do us harm... What has the wunderkind been up to in that arena? Why of course he's stopping the prosecution of them of course. Sending the message that if you slaughter American service members then you will not face any retribution.

During the election we were not supposed to mention Obama's close ties to islam, but now that he's in office he's running around the world himself touting them as strong suits and kissing muslim ass on al-Jazeera. He is actively proving that he detests our military service members. He counts their sacrifices for nothing! On the other hand god forbid that some muslim terrorist pig fucker is inconvenienced by having to hang out in Gitmo or by being tried for planning the murder of American sailors!

Shame on you Barry and shame on you America for allowing this idiot into office.

Oh Poor Pitiful Me

Click the title of this post to read the AP article that inspired it... That article details the first release of a video of an interrogation of a POW at Gitmo.

The POW in question is the 16 year old Canadian, Omar Khadr who was captured after being wounded during a firefight in Afghanistan in which among other things, he threw a grenade which killed Special Forces medic, SFC Christopher Speer and blinded another soldier Layne Morris. He is one of a family of Egyptian terrorists with Canadian citizenship.

Liberals have attempted to paint this video as proof absolute of the inhumane conditions at Gitmo and the "harsh" treatment these "poor" POW's are receiving. They seem to have their panties in a bunch about the fact that this is a "child" and as such should not be treated like a POW instead he should be eating ice cream and making prom plans instead of being "tortured" by his American swine captors.

Look, this is a child. That is true. Legally, in the US a 16 year old is considered a child... In most other countries of the world however a 16 year old is considered a man. A 16 year old is indeed capable of pulling a trigger and tossing a grenade. A 16 year old is additionally capable of telling right from wrong. I mean a two year old will lie about their misbehaviour, proving that even at that early age they are forming the ability to distinguish right from wrong. You see the development of this ability is nearly finished by the time a child reaches the age of 16, it doesn't suddenly spring into existence overnight when a child reaches their 18th birthday. Children are tried as adults in our courts here all the time and they are certainly not enemy combatants! I've seen 5 year olds acting as the heads of households in AIDS riddled Africa and children far younger than this kid carrying rifles in the militaries of many countries. Attempting to use this misguided youth as some poster child to indict our troops of "abuses" is ridiculous. It attempts to impose American sensibilities on parts of the world where they couldn't be any more alien.

In the article one of Khadr's lawyers is quoted as saying, "We hope that the Canadian government will finally come to recognize that the so-called legal process that has been put in place to deal with Omar Khadr's situation is grossly unfair and abusive. It's not appropriate to simply allow this process to run its course."

It is actually unfair to allow this person to go unpunished for causing the death of Christopher Speer and for maiming of Layne Morris.

Another quoted person describes Khadr as a "screwed up young man" whose trust had been abused by just about everyone who had ever been responsible for him — including his family and the U.S. military.

Listen, the world is full of screwed up young men who often grow to become screwed up old men and these screwed up people perform atrocious acts at any and all stages of life. His history and "screwed up" status does not excuse his actions nor does it indicate that any mercy is indicated.

The fact that he is indeed sitting in front of a camera alive and talking to a Canadian interrogator is certainly far superior to the alternative that has been presented to every American prisoner in this conflict. That in itself is the ultimate form of mercy and far more than this person deserves. Charles Manson was at some point a "screwed up young man" and the same could be said of Adolf Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer and any number of other infamous personalities.

If you misguided bleeding heart liberals are so sure that this "kid" is a poor misunderstood cherub, how about we let him stay with you in your house?

If you don't believe that this person belongs in Gitmo then explain how he wound up without parental oversight in the company of Arab terrorists in Afghanistan hundreds of miles from Egypt and and thousands of miles from Canada at the tender age of 15.

Friend or Foe

The Son of Lybian strong man, Mouammar Gadhafi, Seif al-Islam Gadhafi is sponsoring and leading a terrorist cell inside Iraq, in the northern city of Mosul. In recent years Gadhafi senior has been making moves to bring his nation back into the mainstream, but it would appear that his son is swinging for the other team! So while his father is recanting his previous terrorist activities, the son is propagating more.

Gadhafi has already lost one son to the force of American arms, perhaps it's time for him to lose another.

This type of thing abounds, from Gadhafi to Putin's little bomber escapades, I am tired of being sold a bill of goods by these foreign countries. Either you are with us or you are against us.

We have the liberals to thank for it. Their activities have made us look weak in the eyes of our foes. How do they think you can ever achieve any accommodation in the international arena if you are dealing from a position of weakness? This is especially true with dictators. The only thing they understand is strength. It's how they came to power and how they maintain the reins of power.

Not Found on the Front Page

In other news that you are unlikely to find on the front page of your average large liberal leaning newspapers or as a featured story on your run-of-the-mill Communist News Network "news" broadcast...

The feds have broken up a plot to attack a military base in Arizona. Why won't you see this as a lead story in the mainstream media? Because the attackers and their weapons (explosives, biological agents and missiles) were being smuggled into the US across the Mexican border. Extremists from Iraq and Afghanistan forged a deal with drug lords to smuggle the assault force into the US across our porous southern border.

Several operatives are known to have already made the trip into the US and are now residing in safe houses in southern Texas. Federal agents are working now to apprehend these individuals.

The military base, Fort Huachuca had been warned of the plot in advance and had hardened security. Fort Huachuca is used to train Army intelligence operatives to collect intelligence from Middle Eastern battlefields. It is believed that the efficiency of these military intelligence officers was the impetus for this planned attack.

This is just another compelling reason to close the southern border. Not only are criminals of all sorts streaming across the border and violent gangs like MS13, but now also islamic radicals. Close the border now. It is time for the government to enforce existing laws and stem the flow of riffraff into our nation! They are constitutionally charged with the responsibility to protect us and they are failing at that responsibility.

A Message Directly From General Patton

Watch it and heed his words!

Twenty Five Percent

A recent Pew Research poll found that one in four young American Muslims find suicide bombings to defend their religion acceptable.

In view of the recent widely blogged information regarding Islamberg and the recently uncovered scheme to attack soldiers at Fort Dix New Jersey, one has to ask themselves what should be done to ensure that adherents to the "religion of peace" remain peaceful.

If you talk to a liberal about the second amendment they will point out that even the first amendment is subject to reasonable limitations, Well one of those reasonable limitations to the first amendment is that one's freedom of speech is not to be used to incite another to break the law.

A normal human being does not come upon the idea of killing themselves as a part of an armed resistance. In most cases, a normal person will consider an attack that spares their own lives so that they live to fight another day and perhaps enjoy the fruits of their efforts.

Therefore the suicide bomber idea is being placed there. These young men are being radicalised, most likely by their imams. That is where the limitations to the freedom of speech should be employed and the laws regarding inciting others to criminal acts prosecuted.

The New Afghanistan

It would appear that after removing the Al Quaida training sites from Afghanistan, they needed to find new locations to train in. It would appear that some of their new real estate is in Catskills of New York state.

I've read about this now on several blogs. I saw it first on Ogre's blog, then on ALa's Blonde Sagacity, then War on Guns... This has been pretty well covered. I find it interesting though that the article linked is from a Canadian News outlet instead of a domestic one. Is our domestic media that compromised that they will not report on such things? Why has no one else corroborated this story?

The community has a web page that you can find here. Looks like a pretty ramshackle affair if you ask me.

Look, who knows if the claims made in the article are true or not, but if citizens complain about the sounds of explosions and gunfire coming from a place inhabited (by most reports) mainly by ex-cons shouldn't some official attention should be paid to the place? You know, send a police cruiser by to check the place out. How much of a hassle would that be? Isn't that what we pay all of our taxes for?

C'mon Sing It With Me!

M - I - C
K - E - Y
All the Jews must die!

Jews must die
Jews must die
Forever let us hold their entrails high high high!

Jews are dirty just like pigs, that's clear for all to see

M - I - C
K - E - Y
All the Jews must die!

---

Note: the previous was a parody not intended to be a statement of my stance toward the Jewish people. It was intended to graphically point out the absurdity of having a children's show that indoctrinates children into the hatred that has fueled the killing in the Middle East for decades! Peace in the Middle East will only come with moderation. Teaching your children to hate is about as far from moderation as you can get!

A Traitor in Our Midst

Federal judge, Holly Fitzsimmons from Bridgeport Connecticut refused bail for Hassan Abujihaad who's been accused of passing classified information to al Quaeda in hopes of enabling attacks on US Navy warships. Abujihaad, formerly known as Paul Hall prior to his conversion to islam served in the US Navy aboard the guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold in 2000 and 2001.

If this guy is indeed found guilty of these charges I hope the federal court has the courage to levy they type of punishment that traitors deserve! Throw the book at him! I'm sorry if you don't agree with me, but there are very few lower crimes in my eyes than betraying your brothers in arms.

Say goodbye to another piece of subhuman trash

It would appear that Shamil Basayev was killed today when a truck carrying dynamite that he was driving near exploded. I can not say that I will personally miss him. In fact I believe that this world is a better place with his entrails spread across the Russian countryside fertilizing weeds. It is s true pity that his death was so fast. I would have prefered that he suffer a long and agonizing death. For those of you unaware of why I might feel this way about this dirtbag, allow me to refresh your memory.




This is just a small sampling of this filth's handiwork. For me, there is nothing that justifies the intentional targetting of innocent children, not even retribution. Since we got Zarqawi and now Basayev, now all we need to complete the set is bin Laden and al Zawahiri.

Pull Out Now!!! (because we're winning)

The pacifist left in this country is constantly bemoaning the fact that we are (in their words) "losing" the war in Iraq. Fortunately that does not reflect the truth on the ground. The true impact of our efforts are best judged in the words of our foes. The cited link above will take you to a translated document discovered in Iraq during the pursuit of al-Zarqawi (may he roast in hell!).

For those who claim that pulling out now is a "smart" plan, perhaps the following Zarqawi tidbit from the cited document will be enlightening:

...time is now beginning to be of service to the American forces and
harmful to the resistance...

Clearly our continued presence in Iraq is causing al-Quaida heart-burn. Zarqawi goes on to enumerate the reasons why our continued presence in Iraq is "harmful to the resistance"; among them the on-going training of Iraqi forces, "massive" disruptive arrest operations, restriction of finances, splintering insurgent forces, etc... Clearly none of these benefits could be reaped if we are not in Iraq.

Zarqawi goes on to list some plans that would allow them to mitigate the "current bleak situation"... Mainly diverting U.S. attention to a dupe target like the Iraqi Shiites or Iran.

Interestingly one of the main tools Zarqawi hopes to use is the media to sway public sentiment.

Read the document and explain to me how running away now could possibly bring as many benefits as sticking it out and being a thorn in the terrorists' side.

Further, think through current events and ask yourself, what more likely explanations there could be. For example the Haditha affair. If al-Quaida wanted to foment discontent all they'd need to do is kill some people and incriminate US forces. Incriminating US forces would not be that hard. One would need only kill some people with American ammunition and then get some sympathizers to cry "massacre". The United States does not have a monopoly on 5.56mm ammunition after all. For proof I offer the following picture of Zarqawi himself:

Do you know what the weapon is that he is holding? American grunts call it a SAW, a US issue 5.56mm machinegun. Now, am I saying that it is absolutely inconceivable that a Marine Corps patrol would go berserk with grief and start offing innocent civilians? Certainly not, but it would be uncharacteristic. Is it more likely that Zarqawi's folks would do such a thing? Consult the following picture for your answer to that question.

I believe that if these marines are given a fair shake they will be vindicated. Anyone who's watched CSI knows that it is possible to match expended bullets to the weapon that fired them. That should be able to prove or disprove the accusations that have been levied. Unfortunately the left and the media have already tried and convicted these men... Pretty much the way they tried and convicted Karl Rove (and we all know how well that went for them). When it comes down to it, who do you trust more, your countrymen or the enemies of your country?

At any rate, do take the time to read the cited article, it is certainly an eye-opener (unless of course you've super-glued your eyes shut as some in this nation have).

Oh and one last dumb question... What does a pious fucker like Zarqawi need a "leopard-print nightgown" for? Perhaps he liked cross-dressing, but that hardly presents the image of the "holy" warrior now does it?